Weraki
Book a consultation
Toolkit Strategy 3 min read

The GE-McKinsey Nine-Box Matrix: a tool for assessing and optimizing a business portfolio

In portfolio management, deciding which businesses to invest in, which to maintain and which to exit plays a central role in a strategy for sustainable growth.

Trương Quỳnh PhươngFounder & Chair, Weraki
Translated from the Vietnamese original

The GE-McKinsey Nine-Box Matrix offers a systematic way for a company to assess and prioritize its business units on two factors: how attractive the industry is, and how competitive the unit is.

Two axes, nine boxes

The matrix has nine boxes formed by two main axes:

Vertical axis
Industry attractiveness: high, medium, low.
Horizontal axis
The business unit’s competitive strength: high, medium, low.
The GE-McKinsey nine-box matrix
Business unit competitive strength →
High
Medium
Low
High
Invest & growInvest/Grow
Invest & growInvest/Grow
Select & maintainSelectivity/Earnings
Medium
Invest & growInvest/Grow
Select & maintainSelectivity/Earnings
Harvest & divestHarvest/Divest
Low
Select & maintainSelectivity/Earnings
Harvest & divestHarvest/Divest
Harvest & divestHarvest/Divest
↑ Industry attractiveness

Three groups of strategy

Where a unit sits in the matrix points to the right strategy:

  1. Invest & growWhen a unit is highly competitive in an attractive industry, the company should concentrate resources on expanding it and gaining share.
  2. Select & maintain (Selectivity/Earnings)When the industry is moderately attractive, or the unit lacks a strong competitive advantage, the company should reassess the strategy, focus on improving performance and optimize profit.
  3. Harvest & divestWhen a unit has weak competitive strength in an unattractive industry, the company should consider cutting investment or divesting to free up resources.

What the matrix helps a company do

  1. Make decisions based on an objective assessment of the market and internal capabilities.
  2. Allocate resources effectively across business units.
  3. Spot investment opportunities and flag areas of high risk.

Compared with the BCG matrix

Compared with the BCG matrix, this model is more flexible for assessing a portfolio, because it weighs more factors than growth rate and market share alone. That gives a company a more complete view when building its long-term strategy.

Which of your business units deserve more resources, and which should you pull back from?

Book a consultation
Get new insights by email
By subscribing, you agree to Weraki’s Privacy Policy.

More insights

Strategy McKinsey’s Three Horizons: a framework for sustainable growth Strategy Blue Ocean Strategy: the Four Actions Framework for reshaping value and opening new markets

Weraki uses essential cookies to run the website and analytics cookies to understand how it is used. You can choose essential cookies only. Privacy Policy.